Yesterday, I looked at the best AV-weighted winning percentages of offensive players. Today, we examine the same numbers but for defensive players and kickers since 1960. Again, players who entered the league prior to 1960 are included, but for purposes of this study, only their 1960+ seasons count (assuming they produced at least 50 points of AV). That’s a pretty important bit of detail to mention when it comes to the top player on the list. The player with the best AV-adjusted winning percentage since 1960 is Packers linebacker Bill Forester, who entered the NFL in 1953 but only gets credit for his 1960-1963 seasons in Green Bay (spoiler: those were pretty good ones). After him, of course, we have yet another Patriots lineman. Today it’s Vince Wilfork:
Defensive Linemen
Wilfork has an incredible 0.783 winning percentage: it’s been a very good decade in New England, and that doesn’t even include the ’01 season. Bubba Smith comes in at #5, while Otis Sistrunk, Bill Stanfill, Charles Haley, Raheem Brock, Corey Simon (?!), and Larry Cole also crack the top twenty.
Among active players, Dwight Freeney and Robert Mathis are the second and third “winningest” defensive linemen, but both are far behind Wilfork. Haloti Ngata, Shaun Phillips (who is really more linebacker), Brett Keisel, Justin Tuck, and John Abraham also make the top 300.
Linebackers
In addition to Forester, Raiders linebackers Dan Conners and Gus Otto both crack the top ten. Next up at #15 is NaVorro Bowman, who has a 0.748 adjusted winning percentage. Other notables; Phil Villapiano, Keena Turner, and Jack Reynolds come in at 47, 48, and 49, Mike Vrabel and Jack Ham at 54 and 55, and Tedy Bruschi ranks 62nd. Among active players, Clay Matthews and James Harrison also crack the top 100.
Defensive Backs
Among defensive backs, players from the ’60s and ’70s dominate: George Atkinson (Oakland), Jake Scott (Miami), Curtis Johnson (Miami), Herb Adderley (Green Bay), and Charlie Waters rank in the top sixteen, with the late Dave Duerson at #18 and Merton Hanks at 20. Among active players, Asante Samuel (0.717), Troy Polamalu (0.697), and Antoine Bethea (0.690 and now in San Francisco) have the best AV-adjusted winning percentages.
Hall of Famers
What about the best and worst AV-adjusted winning percentages of players in the Hall of Fame? Remember, we’re only looking at seasons since 1960. The table below shows the AV Adjusted winning percentages for all players in the Hall of Fame with at least 50 points of AV. It also includes their “actual record” which I’m putting in quotes because it’s the records of the teams they played on and not the actual records of those players. And please be sure to read this footnote. [1]For someone like Jerry Rice, who played for two teams in one season, the record is misleading because I’ve combined the records of both of his teams that year. But I was in a rush, and I … Continue reading
O.J. Simpson‘s teams had the worst record of any player in the Hall of Fame, although for AV-adjusted winning percentage, Cortez Kennedy has him beat. One reason for that? In Simpson’s best year, the Bills went 8-6, while in Kennedy’s top season, the Seahawks finished 2-14. The remainder of the bottom of the list of AV-adjusted winning percentages of HOFers is no surprise: Tampa Bay’s Lee Roy Selmon, Denver’s Floyd Little, Chicago’s Dick Butkus and Gale Sayers, Simpson’s teammate in Buffalo, Joe DeLamielleure, and Houston’s Elvin Bethea (another Oiler, Earl Campbell, isn’t too far behind).
The list of the Hall of Famers with the best career adjusted winning percentages won’t bring any surprises, either. Raiders and Packers and Steelers tend to dominate the top of the list, along with Paul Warfield, the wide receiver whose career has confounded analysts for decades.
References
↑1 | For someone like Jerry Rice, who played for two teams in one season, the record is misleading because I’ve combined the records of both of his teams that year. But I was in a rush, and I figured I’d rather include the data with a disclaimer than not include it at all. Even by “good enougher” standards this one was pretty bad, but… oh well. |
---|