Yesterday, I looked at passing first down data, with an emphasis on percentage of passing plays (including sacks) that went for first downs.
The 2016 Atlanta Falcons had an incredible offense. Like, a really, really good offense that had lots of eye-popping statistics. Here’s another one: the Falcons picked up 239 passing first downs on 537 pass attempts plus 37 sacks. That means Matt Ryan and company picked up a first down on 41.6% of all passing plays. That’s the fourth best rate in NFL history.
The best rate belongs to the 2004 Colts, at 44.0%.
The second-best rate belongs to the 2013 Broncos, at 42.2%.
The third-best rate belongs to the 2006 Colts, at 42.1%.
Any guesses what those three teams have in common?
The 2004 Colts had Peyton Manning and Marvin Harrison, Reggie Wayne, Dallas Clark, and Brandon Stokley.
The 2006 Colts had Manning, Harrison, Wayne, and Clark, too.
The 2013 Broncos? They had Manning, Demaryius Thomas, Eric Decker, Wes Welker, and Julius Thomas (Stokley was on the 2012 Broncos).
So maybe it was the quarterback. The table below shows the top 100 teams in percentage of team passing plays that went for a first down.
Rk | Team | Year | Att | Sack | First Down | 1D/PP% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | IND | 2004 | 527 | 14 | 238 | 44.0% |
2 | DEN | 2013 | 675 | 20 | 293 | 42.2% |
3 | IND | 2006 | 557 | 15 | 241 | 42.1% |
4 | ATL | 2016 | 537 | 37 | 239 | 41.6% |
5 | MIA | 1984 | 572 | 14 | 243 | 41.5% |
6 | SDG | 1982 | 338 | 12 | 145 | 41.4% |
7 | NOR | 2011 | 662 | 24 | 280 | 40.8% |
8 | SDG | 2009 | 519 | 26 | 222 | 40.7% |
9 | NWE | 2011 | 612 | 32 | 262 | 40.7% |
10 | IND | 2005 | 515 | 20 | 217 | 40.6% |
11 | SDG | 2010 | 544 | 38 | 236 | 40.5% |
12 | DAL | 2014 | 476 | 30 | 205 | 40.5% |
13 | ARI | 2015 | 562 | 27 | 237 | 40.2% |
14 | SDG | 2013 | 544 | 30 | 230 | 40.1% |
15 | TEN | 2003 | 502 | 25 | 211 | 40.0% |
16 | NWE | 2007 | 586 | 21 | 243 | 40.0% |
17 | STL | 2001 | 551 | 40 | 236 | 39.9% |
18 | SFO | 1989 | 483 | 45 | 209 | 39.6% |
19 | WAS | 1991 | 447 | 9 | 179 | 39.3% |
20 | IND | 2009 | 601 | 13 | 241 | 39.3% |
21 | GNB | 2014 | 536 | 30 | 222 | 39.2% |
22 | STL | 2000 | 587 | 44 | 247 | 39.1% |
23 | CIN | 1988 | 392 | 30 | 165 | 39.1% |
24 | DAL | 2007 | 531 | 25 | 217 | 39.0% |
25 | SFO | 1984 | 496 | 27 | 204 | 39.0% |
26 | SDG | 1980 | 594 | 32 | 244 | 39.0% |
27 | GNB | 2011 | 552 | 41 | 230 | 38.8% |
28 | SDG | 1985 | 632 | 39 | 259 | 38.6% |
29 | SFO | 1994 | 511 | 35 | 210 | 38.5% |
30 | KAN | 2004 | 561 | 32 | 228 | 38.4% |
31 | ATL | 2012 | 615 | 28 | 247 | 38.4% |
32 | SEA | 2005 | 474 | 27 | 192 | 38.3% |
33 | NWE | 2012 | 641 | 27 | 256 | 38.3% |
34 | NOR | 2012 | 671 | 26 | 267 | 38.3% |
35 | SDG | 2011 | 582 | 30 | 234 | 38.2% |
36 | OAK | 1974 | 335 | 24 | 137 | 38.2% |
37 | NOR | 2009 | 544 | 20 | 215 | 38.1% |
38 | SFO | 1987 | 501 | 29 | 202 | 38.1% |
39 | DEN | 2012 | 588 | 21 | 232 | 38.1% |
40 | DAL | 1995 | 494 | 18 | 195 | 38.1% |
41 | PIT | 2011 | 539 | 42 | 221 | 38.0% |
42 | SDG | 2008 | 478 | 25 | 191 | 38.0% |
43 | SFO | 1993 | 524 | 35 | 212 | 37.9% |
44 | NOR | 2016 | 674 | 27 | 265 | 37.8% |
45 | NWE | 2004 | 485 | 26 | 193 | 37.8% |
46 | MIA | 1986 | 645 | 17 | 250 | 37.8% |
47 | BUF | 1991 | 516 | 35 | 208 | 37.7% |
48 | GNB | 1983 | 526 | 42 | 214 | 37.7% |
49 | PIT | 2014 | 612 | 33 | 243 | 37.7% |
50 | TAM | 2017 | 605 | 40 | 243 | 37.7% |
51 | MIN | 1998 | 533 | 25 | 210 | 37.6% |
52 | MIN | 2004 | 552 | 46 | 225 | 37.6% |
53 | MIA | 1974 | 283 | 31 | 118 | 37.6% |
54 | GNB | 1995 | 593 | 33 | 235 | 37.5% |
55 | OAK | 1976 | 361 | 28 | 146 | 37.5% |
56 | SFO | 1992 | 480 | 32 | 192 | 37.5% |
57 | MIN | 2009 | 553 | 34 | 220 | 37.5% |
58 | KAN | 2006 | 450 | 41 | 184 | 37.5% |
59 | NOR | 2014 | 659 | 30 | 258 | 37.4% |
60 | HOU | 2009 | 593 | 25 | 231 | 37.4% |
61 | DAL | 2016 | 483 | 28 | 191 | 37.4% |
62 | CHI | 1995 | 523 | 15 | 201 | 37.4% |
63 | NYG | 1957 | 269 | 7 | 103 | 37.3% |
64 | PIT | 2004 | 358 | 36 | 147 | 37.3% |
65 | NWE | 2017 | 587 | 35 | 232 | 37.3% |
66 | GNB | 2004 | 598 | 14 | 228 | 37.3% |
67 | DEN | 2000 | 569 | 30 | 223 | 37.2% |
68 | BAL | 1959 | 375 | 23 | 148 | 37.2% |
69 | NYJ | 1998 | 532 | 25 | 207 | 37.2% |
70 | HOU | 1990 | 639 | 39 | 251 | 37.0% |
71 | RAM | 1954 | 321 | 17 | 125 | 37.0% |
72 | OAK | 1975 | 350 | 26 | 139 | 37.0% |
73 | IND | 2007 | 551 | 23 | 212 | 36.9% |
74 | RAM | 1988 | 522 | 28 | 203 | 36.9% |
75 | CAR | 2015 | 501 | 33 | 197 | 36.9% |
76 | NWE | 2010 | 507 | 25 | 196 | 36.8% |
77 | BAL | 1976 | 361 | 30 | 144 | 36.8% |
78 | PIT | 1978 | 380 | 25 | 149 | 36.8% |
79 | STL | 1999 | 530 | 33 | 207 | 36.8% |
80 | NYJ | 2002 | 485 | 32 | 190 | 36.8% |
81 | IND | 2008 | 585 | 14 | 220 | 36.7% |
82 | CLE | 1959 | 276 | 21 | 109 | 36.7% |
83 | ATL | 1998 | 424 | 53 | 175 | 36.7% |
84 | DAL | 1971 | 361 | 32 | 144 | 36.6% |
85 | MIA | 1985 | 576 | 19 | 218 | 36.6% |
86 | HOU | 2010 | 574 | 32 | 222 | 36.6% |
87 | SFO | 1998 | 556 | 53 | 223 | 36.6% |
88 | LAC | 2017 | 583 | 18 | 220 | 36.6% |
89 | PIT | 2007 | 442 | 47 | 179 | 36.6% |
90 | CLE | 1955 | 234 | 34 | 98 | 36.6% |
91 | PHI | 1980 | 477 | 32 | 186 | 36.5% |
92 | CLE | 1953 | 303 | 31 | 122 | 36.5% |
93 | CIN | 1982 | 310 | 27 | 123 | 36.5% |
94 | RAI | 1990 | 336 | 29 | 133 | 36.4% |
95 | MIA | 1972 | 259 | 21 | 102 | 36.4% |
96 | MIN | 2000 | 495 | 35 | 193 | 36.4% |
97 | IND | 2010 | 679 | 16 | 253 | 36.4% |
98 | NWE | 2009 | 592 | 18 | 222 | 36.4% |
99 | DEN | 2014 | 607 | 17 | 227 | 36.4% |
100 | IND | 2014 | 661 | 29 | 251 | 36.4% |
And the top 100 defenses by the same metric since 1950.
Rk | Team | Year | Pass Att | Sack | First Down | 1D/PP All% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | MIN | 1969 | 410 | 49 | 88 | 19.2% |
2 | OAK | 1967 | 459 | 67 | 103 | 19.6% |
3 | SFO | 1952 | 342 | 36 | 76 | 20.1% |
4 | MIN | 1971 | 405 | 27 | 88 | 20.4% |
5 | RAM | 1950 | 385 | 37 | 88 | 20.9% |
6 | GNB | 1963 | 378 | 39 | 87 | 20.9% |
7 | ATL | 1977 | 320 | 42 | 76 | 21% |
8 | CLE | 1951 | 330 | 54 | 81 | 21.1% |
9 | PIT | 1974 | 339 | 52 | 83 | 21.2% |
10 | MIA | 1973 | 322 | 45 | 78 | 21.3% |
11 | RAM | 1967 | 445 | 43 | 104 | 21.3% |
12 | GNB | 1967 | 337 | 29 | 78 | 21.3% |
13 | MIN | 1970 | 367 | 49 | 89 | 21.4% |
14 | SFO | 1950 | 347 | 31 | 81 | 21.4% |
15 | PHI | 1954 | 345 | 43 | 84 | 21.6% |
16 | PHI | 1950 | 277 | 22 | 65 | 21.7% |
17 | STL | 1966 | 443 | 52 | 109 | 22% |
18 | CHI | 1950 | 354 | 45 | 88 | 22.1% |
19 | PIT | 1975 | 396 | 43 | 97 | 22.1% |
20 | SFO | 1951 | 353 | 27 | 84 | 22.1% |
21 | DAL | 1977 | 370 | 53 | 94 | 22.2% |
22 | PIT | 1950 | 300 | 46 | 77 | 22.3% |
23 | DET | 1976 | 313 | 28 | 76 | 22.3% |
24 | OAK | 1973 | 370 | 40 | 92 | 22.4% |
25 | CHI | 1958 | 327 | 47 | 84 | 22.5% |
26 | CLE | 1950 | 292 | 24 | 71 | 22.5% |
27 | CLE | 1954 | 300 | 22 | 73 | 22.7% |
28 | DEN | 1971 | 356 | 44 | 91 | 22.8% |
29 | RAM | 1951 | 329 | 40 | 84 | 22.8% |
30 | HOU | 1976 | 345 | 50 | 90 | 22.8% |
31 | OAK | 1969 | 422 | 47 | 107 | 22.8% |
32 | OAK | 1968 | 446 | 49 | 113 | 22.8% |
33 | RAM | 1953 | 366 | 37 | 92 | 22.8% |
34 | WAS | 1976 | 354 | 44 | 91 | 22.9% |
35 | MIN | 1975 | 360 | 46 | 93 | 22.9% |
36 | ATL | 1978 | 444 | 47 | 113 | 23% |
37 | SDG | 1965 | 474 | 38 | 118 | 23% |
38 | PHI | 1953 | 374 | 51 | 98 | 23.1% |
39 | KAN | 1965 | 451 | 39 | 113 | 23.1% |
40 | PHI | 1955 | 272 | 27 | 69 | 23.1% |
41 | HOU | 1969 | 371 | 32 | 93 | 23.1% |
42 | RAM | 1977 | 370 | 36 | 94 | 23.2% |
43 | CLE | 1973 | 312 | 29 | 79 | 23.2% |
44 | NYG | 1950 | 295 | 33 | 76 | 23.2% |
45 | PIT | 1976 | 373 | 41 | 96 | 23.2% |
46 | PIT | 1973 | 359 | 33 | 91 | 23.2% |
47 | MIN | 1972 | 331 | 21 | 82 | 23.3% |
48 | NYJ | 1968 | 403 | 43 | 104 | 23.3% |
49 | TAM | 1979 | 436 | 40 | 111 | 23.3% |
50 | RAM | 1973 | 328 | 45 | 87 | 23.3% |
51 | TAM | 1999 | 573 | 43 | 144 | 23.4% |
52 | MIN | 1977 | 312 | 30 | 80 | 23.4% |
53 | KAN | 1969 | 426 | 48 | 111 | 23.4% |
54 | BUF | 1960 | 429 | 36 | 109 | 23.4% |
55 | SFO | 1976 | 374 | 61 | 102 | 23.4% |
56 | SDG | 1961 | 485 | 42 | 124 | 23.5% |
57 | HOU | 1961 | 493 | 41 | 126 | 23.6% |
58 | PHI | 1952 | 343 | 51 | 93 | 23.6% |
59 | CHI | 1967 | 384 | 30 | 98 | 23.7% |
60 | GNB | 1962 | 355 | 42 | 94 | 23.7% |
61 | TAM | 2002 | 510 | 43 | 131 | 23.7% |
62 | CIN | 1972 | 350 | 38 | 92 | 23.7% |
63 | DAL | 1970 | 399 | 41 | 105 | 23.9% |
64 | RAM | 1952 | 360 | 46 | 97 | 23.9% |
65 | RAM | 1975 | 387 | 43 | 103 | 24% |
66 | NYJ | 1967 | 424 | 39 | 111 | 24% |
67 | BAL | 2000 | 528 | 35 | 135 | 24% |
68 | PHI | 1951 | 287 | 34 | 77 | 24% |
69 | CLE | 1953 | 389 | 32 | 101 | 24% |
70 | WAS | 1977 | 380 | 45 | 102 | 24% |
71 | NYJ | 2009 | 501 | 32 | 128 | 24% |
72 | OAK | 1966 | 405 | 36 | 106 | 24% |
73 | KAN | 1966 | 494 | 26 | 125 | 24% |
74 | CHI | 1985 | 522 | 64 | 141 | 24.1% |
75 | CHI | 1984 | 435 | 72 | 122 | 24.1% |
76 | BAL | 1971 | 361 | 33 | 95 | 24.1% |
77 | PIT | 1966 | 397 | 38 | 105 | 24.1% |
78 | DET | 1967 | 312 | 39 | 85 | 24.2% |
79 | DAL | 2003 | 492 | 32 | 127 | 24.2% |
80 | NYG | 1958 | 311 | 19 | 80 | 24.2% |
81 | GNB | 1966 | 390 | 47 | 106 | 24.3% |
82 | HOU | 1962 | 486 | 32 | 126 | 24.3% |
83 | MIN | 1973 | 377 | 30 | 99 | 24.3% |
84 | BAL | 1970 | 452 | 41 | 120 | 24.3% |
85 | CLE | 1952 | 348 | 42 | 95 | 24.4% |
86 | BAL | 1999 | 599 | 49 | 158 | 24.4% |
87 | CHI | 1960 | 291 | 53 | 84 | 24.4% |
88 | PIT | 1978 | 442 | 44 | 119 | 24.5% |
89 | HOU | 1968 | 359 | 33 | 96 | 24.5% |
90 | NYT | 1961 | 462 | 31 | 121 | 24.5% |
91 | CLE | 1955 | 323 | 15 | 83 | 24.6% |
92 | GNB | 1952 | 340 | 55 | 97 | 24.6% |
93 | CHI | 1962 | 363 | 48 | 101 | 24.6% |
94 | DEN | 1976 | 391 | 32 | 104 | 24.6% |
95 | DET | 1960 | 354 | 28 | 94 | 24.6% |
96 | CLE | 1957 | 242 | 26 | 66 | 24.6% |
97 | NWE | 1973 | 240 | 32 | 67 | 24.6% |
98 | CHI | 1963 | 353 | 36 | 96 | 24.7% |
99 | PIT | 1955 | 242 | 29 | 67 | 24.7% |
100 | MIN | 1976 | 323 | 45 | 91 | 24.7% |
You will see that there’s only one defense in the last 12 years that makes the list. 🙁
What stands out to you?