≡ Menu

The good Charles showed up against the Saints

The good Charles showed up against the Saints.

A couple of weeks ago, I heard my buddy and co-worker Sigmund Bloom say on the Footballguys Podcast that Jamaal Charles was having one of the craziest seasons ever. As Sigmund noted, Charles has been an incredibly frustrating fantasy player. This year, he had three games with 10 or fewer rushing yards… and he also became the first player in NFL history with two games with over 225 rushing yards in the same season.

Did you know that Kansas City finished 2012 fifth in carries? Under Todd Haley, Chiefs fans and fantasy football players were constantly frustrated by Thomas Jones, who Haley seemed to always find a way to give an extra ten carries to. This year, under Romeo Crennel, Peyton Hillis was the complementary back, but he was not nearly as predatory. Still, while Charles finally received the lion’s share of the carries, he was once again an inconsistent fantasy player.

Take a look at Charles’ weekly game logs:

G#DateOppResultAttYdsYPCTD
109/09/2012ATLL 24-4016875.440
209/16/2012@BUFL 17-35630.50
309/23/2012@NORW 27-24332337.061
409/30/2012SDGL 20-3717885.181
510/07/2012BALL 6-9301404.670
610/14/2012@TAML 10-3812403.330
710/28/2012OAKL 16-26540.80
811/01/2012@SDGL 13-3112393.250
911/12/2012@PITL 13-16231004.351
1011/18/2012CINL 6-2817875.120
1111/25/2012DENL 9-17231074.650
1212/02/2012CARW 27-21271274.70
1312/09/2012@CLEL 7-30181659.171
1412/16/2012@OAKL 0-159101.110
1512/23/2012INDL 13-202222610.271
1612/30/2012@DENW14533.790

That’s a pretty incredible distribution, but how crazy is it?

I looked at the standard deviation of every game by every player in a season with at least 1,000 rushing yards from 1960 to 2011. As it turns out, Charles has had one of the most inconsistent seasons ever. While he gained 1,509 rushing yards, he had a standard deviation of 71.4 yards. That may not mean anything to you in the abstract, but it would place him as the 4th most inconsistent back since 1960.
[continue reading…]

{ 0 comments }