≡ Menu

DeSean Jackson has been putting together long runs for a long time.

In 2010, a third-year DeSean Jackson, playing with the Eagles and Michael Vick, led the NFL in yards per reception at 22.5.

In 2014, in Jackson’s first year with the Redskins, and playing with a rotating trio of quarterbacks in Robert Griffin, Kirk Cousins, and Colt McCoy, Jackson again led the league in yards per reception at 20.9.

In 2016, in Jackson’s final year in Washington, he teamed with Cousins to lead the NFL in yards per reception (17.9) for a third time.

Now, in 2018, alternating between Jameis Winston (15.2 YPC with 198 yards on 13 receptions) and Ryan Fitzpatrick (20.4 YPC with 552 yards on 72 catches), Jackson is once again leading the NFL in yards per reception (18.8).

How remarkable would it be for Jackson to lead the league in yards per reception for a fourth time in his career?  He nearly picked up a fourth crown in his second season, when he was a runner-up to Mike Wallace in 2009.  No player has ever led the NFL in yards per catch four times in their career, and Stanley Morgan (1979, 1980, 1981) and Jimmy Orr (1958, 1964, 1968) are the only players to even do it three times.

So Jackson is already in the discussion for best yards per reception player in league history, but what’s really impressive is his ability to maintain this skill in different environments.  Morgan was on the Patriots all three years, in Ron Erhardt’s vertical offense, with Steve Grogan throwing over two-thirds of passes during those years, and Matt Cavanaugh starting 12 games.   Orr teamed up with three different quarterbacks and two different teams (Bobby Layne in Pittsburgh in 1958, and Johnny Unitas in 1964 and Earl Morrall in 1968 with the Colts).

But Jackson will be with three teams, three coaches, and four different quarterback situations (not to mention, his performance in 2009 came with Donovan McNabb).  Jackson is a remarkable deep threat not dependent on any quarterback, system, or coach. And now, he’s showing that age may not be a key variable, either.

The oldest player to lead a league in yards per reception was Henry Ellard, who averaged 19.5 yards/catch with the Redskins in 1996. No 34-year-old has done it, but Jimmy Orr (25.6 in the 1968 NFL) and Don Maynard (22.8 in the 1968 AFL) did it at age 33. A 32-year-old Joey Galloway led the league in yards per catch in Dallas in 2003 (19.8), and Elbert Dubenion (31 in 1964), DeSean Jackson (30 in 2016), and Malcom Floyd (30 in 2011) are the only other 30+ year old players to win the YPC crown.

Jackson’s performance has fallen with Winston in 2018, and his performance with Winston in 2017 led to the lowest YPC average of his career. We’ll see what happens over the final two games — Jackson is going to miss today’s game due to injury — but Jackson may be on the verge of a record-breaking season.

{ 0 comments }

October 29th, 2017. The Jets hosted the Atlanta Falcons, and after the Falcons won the coin toss and deferred, the Jets received the opening kickoff. Starting at the team’s 25-year line, the Jets marched 75 yards down the field in 8 plays, scoring a touchdown on a 20-yard pass from Josh McCown to Eric Tomlinson.

That wasn’t particularly noteworthy at the time — in fact, it was the third straight game the 3-4 Jets had scored a touchdown on New York’s first drive. But since then, the Jets have consistently disappointed on opening drives. In fact, over the Jets last 21 game, their opening drives have ended in 15 punts, 3 field goals, 2 fumbles, and 1 interception: [continue reading…]

{ 0 comments }

Week 14 Game Scripts: Giants Roll The Redskins

The New York Giants have not been very good this season: heading into week 14, the Giants were 4-8 and ranked 24th in points differential. But on Sunday, the Giants bludgeoned a Redskins team down to third-string quarterback Mark Sanchez, seven years after the Giants bewildered Sanchez in a season-saving victory that launched the team’s Super Bowl success.

The Giants had the best Game Script in week 14, while the Jets had the biggest Game Scripts comeback. The Jets trailed the Bills 17-6 in the 2nd quarter and 20-13 entering the 4th quarter, but came back to beat Buffalo 23-20. The full week 14 Game Scripts are below: [continue reading…]

{ 0 comments }

Parity Does Not Exist In The 2018 NFL

With three weeks left, the NFL playoff picture is nearly complete.  In the AFC, the Chiefs, Patriots, and Chargers are all going to make the postseason; in 2017, Kansas City and New England won their divisions, and the Chargers won 9 games.

The Steelers and Ravens are favorites to go to the postseason; Pittsburgh won the AFC North last year, and Baltimore won 9 games.  The AFC South will likely go to Houston, and that would be the only “surprise” in the AFC this year.  The Texans won just 4 games last year, although expectations were much higher this year with a healthy Deshaun Watson.  The Titans, who made the playoffs last year, are still technically in the hunt for the division title, which would make the AFC (lack of) turnover even more extreme.

Things aren’t much different in the NFC.  The Saints and Rams have already clinched their division titles for the second year in a row. The Seahawks and Cowboys, who each won 9 games last year, will likely be in the postseason this year.  The Bears are the Texans of the NFC, going from 5-11 to division champion with a first round quarterback from the 2017 Draft.  Nobody in the NFC wants the 6th spot, but the Vikings — who went 13-3 last year — are the current favorite.

Think about that: if the season ended today, then 10 of the 12 playoff teams in 2018 had a winning record in 2017. There is still time for the Dolphins or Colts to snag the 6 seed in the AFC from the AFC North runner up, but in the NFC, the Eagles and Panthers (who both won 11+ games last year) are on deck for the 6 seed if the Vikings falter.

How does that compare to prior years? Assuming 10 of the 12 2018 playoff teams — 83% — had a winning record in 2017, that would stand out as a pretty big outlier. It would mark a reversion to the 1980s, pre-salary cap and free agency era of the NFL, where parity didn’t play a central role. The graph below shows, for each year since 1970, the percentage of teams that made the postseason and had a winning record the prior year. [continue reading…]

{ 0 comments }

Week 14 Was Pretty Weird

Entering week 14, the top of the 2019 NFL Draft order was San Francisco at 1, Oakland at 2, and the New York Jets at 3. All three teams promptly won in week 14. The Los Angeles Rams were 11-1, and promptly got embarrassed by the Chicago Bears; Jared Goff, who had never thrown more than 2 interceptions in a game, threw 4 interceptions against a punishing Bears defense. The Oakland Raiders won as 10.5-point underdogs against Pittsburgh, but depending on when you measure it, there was en even more shocking result. The Miami Dolphins were 9.5-point underdogs against the Patriots, trailed by 5 points with 7 seconds left and 69 yards to go, and still won.

In a week like this one, the Texans seeing their 9-game winning streak end at home against the Colts doesn’t quite register as surprising. And the Browns beating anyone, let alone the Panthers? Well, that’s not even a top-5 upset. The table below shows each upset this season, based upon the — as of right now — SRS ratings of each team this year. Here’s how to read it: in week 14, Oakland beat Pittsburgh, 24-21. Oakland has an SRS of -9.1, while the Steelers have an SRS of +5.1. That’s a difference of -14.2 points. There were 6 upsets this week, and a Minnesota upset in Seattle tonight would bring that total to 7. [continue reading…]

{ 0 comments }

On the surface, the Raiders pass defense doesn’t look that terrible. Oakland has allowed 2,920 passing yards, which is actually slightly above average (14th fewest in the NFL). Opposing passers are completing just 62.9% of passes against Oakland, which ranks as the 8th best mark in the NFL. Even in interceptions, where the Raiders are below average, the defense’s 9 interceptions still ranks tied for 21st in the league. So bad, but not particularly noteworthy.

But there are three places where Oakland’s pass defense looks really, really bad.

  • The Raiders have just 10 sacks this season and a 2.8% sack rate; both marks are easily the worst in the league. Only four teams ever have had a sack rate below 3.0% for a full season: the 2008 Chiefs (1.9%), 1981 Colts (2.6%), 2009 Jaguars (2.7%), and 1958 Packers (2.9%). There are 9 players this year with more than 10 sacks, and Khalil Mack (9 sacks in 10 games) is averaging more sacks per game than the entire Raiders defense (10 sacks in 12 games).
  • Opposing passers are averaging 13.76 yards per completion this season.  In the modern era, the average yards per completion has been declining for decades.   The Lions are allowing 12.5 yards/completion this year, the second worst rate in the NFL. How bad has Oakland been? The last time a pass defense allowed this many yards per completion was the 1990 Patriots.
  • The Raiders have allowed 29 touchdown passes, the most in the NFL.  That’s despite facing just 345 pass attempts, the fewest in the NFL.  That’s remarkable and it is because Oakland has allowed a touchdown pass on 8.4% of all passes.  That’s the worst rate of any team since the 1967 Dolphins.

Oakland has allowed 8.7 ANY/A this year, which puts the Raiders in shouting distance for the worst pass defense ever (without adjusting for era, of course). That mark is currently held by the 2015 Saints.

{ 1 comment }

Yesterday, I wrote that NFL yards per carry is at an all-time high. But running backs — while performing very, very well — are not the only reason. In fact, running backs have been responsible for just 81% of all rushing yards this year, which is the lowest since at least 2002:

[continue reading…]

{ 0 comments }

Rushing yards per carry continues to rise: a month ago, I noted that the league-wide yards per carry average was 4.34. If that held, it would set a new record, breaking the 4.29 mark set in 2011.

Since then, rushing efficiency has soared: since week 9, the Panthers are averaging over 6 yards per carry, 9 more teams are averaging over 5 yards per carry, and a total of 23 teams are averaging 4.29 YPC or better. The great rushing performance of the last month (4.61 YPC) has raised the 2018 league average mark to an incredible 4.44 yards per carry.

And yet, rushing quantity has never been lower. For the season, teams are rushing just 25.7 times per game, and even since week 9, that level is just 26.0 rushing attempts per game. This will go down as the season with the fewest rushing attempts in history, and also the season with the highest yards per carry average in history. The common theme here is passing: teams are passing more than ever, and defenses don’t seem very concerned about stopping the run. Offenses want to pass, and defenses are more than happy to allow teams to run (including via non-running back runs). That’s how you get crazy results like this.

And how crazy are these results? Well, take a look at the graph below, which shows every NFL season since 1932.  Each year is on the X-Axis, and there are two Y-Axes: the left Y-Axis shows yards per carry, and the right Y-Axis shows rushing attempts per game.  The NFL average yards per carry is shown in blue dots against that left Y-Axis, and the NFL rushing attempts per game is shown in red diamonds against the right Y-Axis.

{ 0 comments }

Previously:

I am short on time this week, so just a few notes:

The Chargers won with a -6.5 Game Script in Pittsburgh, while the Titans beat the Jets at home despite a -8.2 Game Script. The worst Game Script this year by a winning team was Green Bay at -9.3 in the season opener; the Titans game is the second lowest, followed by the Bears against the Cardinals in week 3, the Panthers in Philadelphia in week 7, and the Chargers/Steelers game. [continue reading…]

{ 0 comments }

On Sunday, the Jets lost to the Titans, 26-22. The Jets averaged 2.47 Adjusted Net Yards per Attempt, which is terrible; Tennessee averaged 7.05 ANY/A, which is a bit above average. In 2018, the average team is gaining 6.47 ANY/A. In other words, the Jets were 4.00 ANY/A below average, and Tennessee was +0.58 ANY/A above average.

Sadly for the Jets, that’s par for the course. There have been 21 games (out of 60) since the start of the 2015 season that the Jets were below average in passing offense and below average in passing defense. Here’s how to read the following graph:

X-Axis: Jets passing ANY/A, relative to league average
Y-Axis: Jets opponent’s passing ANY/A, relative to league average

Each year from 2015 to 2018 has a different data label, shown in the legend in the graph. But here’s the shorthand: dots to the left of the graph mean the Jets passing offense was bad; dots high in the graph mean the Jets passing defense was bad (because the opponent had a positive ANY/A relative to league average). Unfortunately for the Jets, things are getting worse: there are 6 large green dots (representing 2018) where the opponent was above average in ANY/A and the Jets were below average in ANY/A.

Here’s the raw data:

YearG#OppResultANY/AOpp ANY/ALg AvgRANY/AOpp RANY/A
201812TENL 22-262.477.056.47-40.58
201811NWEL 13-275.0910.426.47-1.393.95
201810BUFL 10-410.710.336.47-5.773.86
20189MIAL 6-130.513.716.47-5.96-2.76
20188CHIL 10-245.678.266.47-0.811.78
20187MINL 17-371.716.546.47-4.760.06
20186INDW 42-348.195.726.471.71-0.75
20185DENW 34-168.876.166.472.4-0.31
20184JAXL 12-314.439.36.47-2.042.83
20183CLEL 17-212.154.636.47-4.32-1.84
20182MIAL 12-205.6866.47-0.79-0.47
20181DETW 48-177.611.836.471.14-4.65
201716NWEL 6-265.185.315.91-0.73-0.6
201715LACL 7-141.717.755.91-4.21.84
201714NORL 19-312.57.675.91-3.411.76
201713DENL 0-23-0.166.335.91-6.070.43
201712KANW 38-319.7512.635.913.846.72
201711CARL 27-358.774.975.912.86-0.94
201710TAML 10-154.314.465.91-1.59-1.45
20179BUFW 34-217.486.045.911.570.14
20178ATLL 20-257.679.535.911.763.63
20177MIAL 28-316.57.355.910.591.44
20176NWEL 17-245.576.635.91-0.340.73
20175CLEW 17-145.246.195.91-0.660.28
20174JAXW 23-204.593.085.91-1.31-2.82
20173MIAW 20-610.122.65.914.21-3.3
20172OAKL 20-456.6110.365.910.74.45
20171BUFL 12-212.157.15.91-3.761.19
201616BUFW 30-107.813.446.221.59-2.78
201615NWEL 3-41-0.279.036.22-6.492.82
201614MIAL 13-342.6314.266.22-3.588.05
201613SFOW 23-174.174.866.22-2.05-1.36
201612INDL 10-412.6112.076.22-3.615.85
201611NWEL 17-229.366.526.223.150.3
201610LARL 6-944.76.22-2.22-1.52
20169MIAL 23-273.785.236.22-2.44-0.98
20168CLEW 31-286.725.566.220.51-0.66
20167BALW 24-168.483.136.222.26-3.09
20166ARIL 3-282.8276.22-3.40.78
20165PITL 13-316.449.486.220.223.26
20164SEAL 17-272.9310.246.22-3.284.02
20163KANL 3-24-1.866.896.22-8.080.67
20162BUFW 37-3111.1410.396.224.934.17
20161CINL 22-235.088.086.22-1.131.86
201516BUFL 17-222.186.076.26-4.08-0.2
201515NWEW 26-208.215.946.261.95-0.33
201514DALW 19-166.680.466.260.42-5.81
201513TENW 30-88.545.46.262.28-0.86
201512NYGW 23-207.796.926.261.530.65
201511MIAW 38-209.325.516.263.05-0.76
201510HOUL 17-243.028.366.26-3.242.1
20159BUFL 17-2244.96.26-2.26-1.36
20158JAXW 28-238.366.266.262.10
20157OAKL 20-345.7411.476.26-0.525.21
20156NWEL 23-307.886.616.261.610.35
20155WASW 34-209.542.696.263.27-3.58
20154MIAW 27-146.662.496.260.39-3.78
20153PHIL 17-243.074.416.26-3.2-1.85
20152INDW 20-76.83.656.260.54-2.62
20151CLEW 31-107.255.496.260.99-0.78

What do you think?

{ 0 comments }

It was a rough week 13 for many franchise quarterbacks.

But Patrick Mahomes was just fine, once against finishing as the top quarterback of the week.  It was yet another 4-TD, 120+ passer rating game for Mahomes, the fifth of this season.  By way of comparison, Jim Kelly and Joe Montana only had four such games in their entire careers.  Mahomes now has had a passer rating of at least 110 in 10 of 12 games this year, the second most by a player through 12 games in history (2011 Rodgers did it 11 times).

Of course, none of those stats are adjusted for era. But Mahomes is having a top-4 season for a 2nd-year quarterback since the merger even once you adjust for era, and arguably a top-2 season depending on how you feel about 2013 Nick Foles and a 28-year-old Kurt Warner in 1999. No, it’s not Dan Marino 1984, but it’s pretty clearly the best season a 23-year-old quarterback has had since Marino.

The full week 13 passing stats below: [continue reading…]

{ 0 comments }

It was not a happy birthday for Rodgers

Aaron Rodgers threw 50 passes on Sunday, but only threw for 233 yards. That’s very un-Aaron Rodgers like, who entered the day as the active leader in career yards per pass attempt. For his career, Rodgers averaged 7.87 yards per attempt prior to Sunday, but after yesterday’s performance — a 4.66 average — his career average dropped to 7.84.

Was this the worst game of Rodgers’s career? He had a game where he averaged 0.00 yards per attempt on one pass, but I don’t think you want to count that. He averaged 2.67 yards/attempt is a game against the Patriots in 2006, but he didn’t start the game and he threw just 12 passes. Maybe you prefer the 22-pass game against the 2015 Broncos as the worst Y/A game of his career, since he picked up just 3.5 yards per pass. Then again, there’s also this game against the Bills in 2014, where he averaged 4.4 yards per attempt on 42 passes; that feels even worse than the Denver game.

Because of the large variance in pass attempts, it’s hard to figure out what’s the worst Y/A game of a player’s career. But here’s one method I like: if you remove game X from a player’s career, how much does his career Y/A change? The game that causes the biggest change could be considered the best or worst game of that player’s career.

And by this methodology, the game against the Cardinals yesterday was in fact the worst game of Rodgers’s career. His career yards/attempt average is 7.840. Remove the game where he threw 1 pass for 0 yards, and his career Y/A is 7.841.  If instead you removed the 12-pass Patriots game, Rodgers’s career average would be 7.851.  If you instead removed the Denver game, his career average would be 7.858.  If the one game from Rodgers’s career you had to remove was that Bills game, his career Y/A would rise to 7.867.

But if you want to get his career Y/A average to 7.87, then you need to take out yesterday’s game.  That’s the game that has lowered his career average the most.  Take a look: [continue reading…]

{ 0 comments }

Marcus Mariota Needs To Throw More Incomplete Passes

Mariota is taken down for another sack.

Marcus Mariota is having the worst season of his career.  As a rookie in 2015, he ranked 22nd in ANY/A.  In 2016, he had a very strong year, finishing 8th in Adjusted Net Yards per Attempt. Last year, he fell back to 22nd in ANY/A, and this season, he ranks just 28th in ANY/A.

Of course, it’s important to know which statistics to examine. Mariota has completed 70.3% of his passes; before this year, his career best was a 62.2% rate as a rookie.  But there are two factors that make his completion percentage meaningless: one, completion percentage is rising league-wide, and more importantly, Mariota has taken a ton of sacks.

He has a 12.8% sack rate this year, easily the worst of his career.  What’s really remarkable is the interplay between his completion rate and his sack rate.  Mariota has thrown just 71 incomplete passes all season, while he’s taken 35 sacks.  That’s nearly a 2:1 ratio of incomplete passes to sacks!  By way of comparison, AFC South rival Andrew Luck has a ratio of nearly 13:1 — he’s thrown 138 incomplete passes and taken only 11 sacks.

There have been seven games this season where a quarterback had more sacks than incomplete passes: Mariota is responsible for 3 of those 7, and all 3 were losses (all other quarterbacks are 3-1 in such games): [continue reading…]

{ 0 comments }

The Bucs offense continues to fascinate me. Whether it’s Ryan Fitzpatrick or Jameis Winston, this passing offense continues to be very good but also very turnover prone. Tampa Bay has completed 67.0 percent of passes this season, but the Bucs have also thrown interceptions on 5.1% of all passes. We all know that interception rates have been falling and completion percentage rates have been rising over the last few decades. So let’s put these outlier stats in perspective.

Before the 2018 Buccaneers, the last two teams to have interception rates at 5% or higher were the 2013 Giants and 2010 Vikings. In other words, it’s pretty unusual for this era. And a 67.0% completion rate is pretty rare for older eras. Consider:

  • The 1980 Houston Oilers, with a 35-year-old Ken Stabler, completed 63.9% of passes and threw an interception on 6.0% of passes; that’s the highest completion percentage in history among teams to throw an INT on 5% of passes, but the Bucs are currently on pace to shatter that mark.
  • The 2001 St. Louis Rams, behind Kurt Warner, completed 68.8% of passes and threw an interception on 4.0% of passes.  That’s the highest interception rate among teams to complete 67% of their passes or better; the 2010 Saints (68.1%; 3.3%) and 1993 49ers (67.6%; 3.2%) are the only other teams with a completion percentage above 67% and an interception rate higher than even 3%.  The Bucs are currently blowing that mark out of the water, too.

The graph below shows the completion percentage (X-Axis) and interception rate (Y-Axis) for every team since 1950.  I have put all of the 2018 teams, through 12 weeks, in red dots.  And then the 2018 Bucs are the black dot at (67%, 5%): [continue reading…]

{ 0 comments }

Previously:

Buffalo and Jacksonville played a remarkably run-heavy game in week 12. The two teams combined for 393 rushing yards and just 267 passing yards. That means 59.5% of the total yards in this game came on the ground, making it the first time in a non-December game since 2012 that such a high percentage of yards came on the ground. Josh Allen had 101 yards on the ground prior to kneels, and Blake Bortles added 39 yards rushing.  These are two of the best running quarterbacks in the league, although the Bortles experiment may be ending in Jacksonville.

If this is the end for Bortles, he won’t be remembered as one of the best running quarterbacks ever, but perhaps he should be. He’s one of just six players in NFL history to average over 6 yards per carry and 20 rushing yards per game in his career (minimum 200 carries): [continue reading…]

{ 0 comments }

In 2008, Philip Rivers average 8.04 ANY/A, the best rate in the NFL.  This season, Rivers is averaging 8.96 ANY/A, and yet he ranks just fourth in that metric in 2018. That’s a sign of how far the passing environment has changed in the last decade.

Drew Brees led the NFL in ANY/A in 2009 with an 8.31 average; he’s currently having his best statistic season (without adjusting for era), with a 9.69 ANY/A average that would rank as the second best of the modern era.  He is the frontrunner in the MVP race, and for good reason: his team has the best record in football and he leads all QBs in ANY/A, a double feature that would surely lock up the MVP crown if it is still true by the end of the year.

Below are the season to date passing stats. [continue reading…]

{ 0 comments }

Marcus Mariota went 22/23 against the Texas and he averaged 13.2 yards per attempt. That sounds like it should be one of the great games in NFL history. So how come the Titans scored just 17 points and lost despite such a high completion percentage and no turnovers until the team’s final offensive play? Tennessee even set a new record for completion percentage in a loss! One reason is that the team punted six times, and you might be wondering how is that even possible to have 6 times as many punts as incompletions.

For starters, Mariota took a whopping 6 sacks, a 21% sack rate. And 7 of Mariota’s 22 completions were negative plays according to EPA. That includes three obvious ones: a 4-yard completion on 3rd-and-19, a 7-yard completion on 3rd-and-9, and a 7-yard completion on 3rd-and-8. (Tennessee went for it on 4th-and-1 after that, but failed; the other four failed third down plays that yielded to punts were two Mariota sacks, a Mariota scramble for 8 yards on 3rd-and-16 after another Mariota sack, and a rushing play on 3rd-and-29 following a 15-yard facemask penalty and yet another sack.) But there was also a 2-yard pass on 1st-and-10, a -1 yard completion on 2nd down, a 2-yard completion on 2nd-and-10, and even a 3-yard completion on 2nd-and-5 is considered a negative play (you’d rather re-do the down than take a 3-yard gain on 2nd-and-5). All of the sudden, Mariota’s 22/23 game turns into 15 positive completions on 29 dropbacks, which is a far different story. That’s still a good game, but not a great one, much less an all-time great one.

Mariota finished with the 5th-best performance of the week; below are your week 12 passing stats. [continue reading…]

{ 1 comment }

Why Field Goals Are Less Valuable Than They Used To Be

Nearly two decades ago, David Romer analyzed data from games during the 1999, 2000, and 2001 seasons. Doug Drinen wrote a series of articles about his paper, and one of Doug’s key takeaways was that the value of possession following a kickoff was worth +0.6 points to the receiving team. The natural extension of this is that it means a touchdown is worth 6.4 points and a field goal worth 2.4 points. That also means that a touchdown isn’t just 2.33 times (7 divided by 3) as valuable as a field goal, but 2.67 times as valuable.

Now how did Romer derive that value of +0.6 points? Or, as Doug wrote, what does it mean to say that it is worth +0.5 points to the team with the ball to have 1st-and-10 at your own 20?

The half-a-point value of a first at the 20 includes not only the points that you might score on that drive, but also the points your opponent might score with the field position you’re likely to give them if you don’t score, and the points you’re likely to score with the field position they give you after they do or don’t score, and so on.

But we don’t need to go into the fine details of the system to get to what I want to talk about today. And that is possession has never been more valuable in the NFL. [1]One other reason: teams are better at making field goals, including from very far away, which means getting into likely field goal range requires less yardage than it used to for the offense.

The graph below shows the average points scored by the receiving team following a kickoff in each season since 1999. Note that this includes all quarters (Romer’s study was mostly limited to the first quarter) and all teams, and only includes points scored by the receiving team (Romer’s study focuses on net points (meaning points scored by the kicking team on the ensuing possession), so the numbers are of course lower). But the key is that teams are scoring more points after kickoffs than they did in the early ’00s.


[continue reading…]

References

References
1 One other reason: teams are better at making field goals, including from very far away, which means getting into likely field goal range requires less yardage than it used to for the offense.
{ 1 comment }

How to Calculate Drive Success Rate

Every 1st down represents a new set of downs that gives a team a chance another small battle against the defense.

Take the Saints, for example. How many 1st-and-10s (or 1st-and-goals or 1st-and-longer than 10s) have they had this year? By my count, 339. How did I get there? New Orleans has had 105 drives this year (more on that in a moment) and 282 first downs this year. Now remember that in the NFL, a touchdown is also a first down, and the Saints offense has scored 48 touchdowns this year. Therefore, New Orleans has recorded 234 non-scoring first downs. Add in the 105 1st downs that began every drive, and this means the Saints must have had 339 sets of downs this season.

Let’s look at the Jets for another example. New York has had 126 drives, 153 first downs, and 18 offensive touchdowns. Therefore, the Jets must have had 261 new sets of downs with which to operate.  This methodology should be a pretty accurate way of capturing the number of new sets of downs a team has, although it may be off by 1 or 2 for some teams. (For example, the Jets are probably at 260, not 261; one drive began with an interception but Trumaine Johnson fumbled the return.) You can’t use the actual number of first down plays, because teams often have multiple first down plays due to penalties on the same set of downs (think of a 1st-and-10 where a rusher gains 4 yards and a holding is called, and a team then has a 1st-and-16).

So to calculate the number of sets of downs a team has, you use this formula:

Drives + First Downs Made – Touchdowns

Now how do we calculate the number of drives? That’s pretty simple using the PFR Play Index.

Remember from our work on estimated drives, every drive ends in one of seven ways: [continue reading…]

{ 1 comment }

In 2017, Indianapolis ranked 30th in points and 31st in yards. The Colts also ranked 29th in Net Yards per Attempt and 31st in touchdown passes.

This year, with Andrew Luck back, the Colts rank 5th in points and 9th in yards, while ranking 13th in NY/A and 2nd in touchdown passes. No offense has improved more from 2017 to 2018 than the Colts, and Luck is a big reason why.

Early on this season, it looked like there was something wrong with Luck; through 3 games, he was averaging just 5.34 yards per attempt! Since then, he’s upped his average to 7.63 yards per attempt; that’s actually below the median over that time frame, but coupled with his stellar sack rate and remarkable TD/INT numbers, and he’s been a very valuable quarterback over the last two months.

There are three remarkable Luck numbers this season, but chances are you have only heard of two of them. The Colts star has now gone five straight games without a sack, making him just the 5th player since 1981 to go five straight games with 20+ pass attempts and zero sacks. And Luck has thrown at least 3 touchdown passes in seven straight games, a feat that puts him in even rarer company.

But perhaps the biggest reason for the Colts success right now is how excellent Luck has been on third downs. On average, teams have picked up a first down on 36.9% of all third down pass plays this year. Luck has done it at a rate of 51.9%, making him the most valuable third down passer this season. [continue reading…]

{ 0 comments }

Previously:

In week 11, the Ravens turned to Lamar Jackson, and responded with one of the most run-heavy games in recent memory. Baltimore rushed a whopping 54 times, the most in a non-overtime game since 2014. Jackson himself was responsible for half of those carries, 5 more than any player with at least five pass attempts in a game since 1950.

Not surprisingly, the Ravens dominated time of possession in this game, holding the ball for over 38 minutes. Jackson was an effective enough passer: he picked up a first down on 7 of 21 dropbacks, which is league average. We’ll see if this strategy can work for Baltimore once again — a quarterback running 15 times a week feels unsustainable, let alone 27 — but it certainly makes the Ravens more interesting.

Arizona and Jacksonville were your most run-heavy teams of the week. Leonard Fournette had 28 carries for the Jaguars, and the team rushed on 35.8% of all plays.  For the Cardinals, David Johnson had 25 carries, and Arizona had just 21 dropbacks, despite trailing for much of the second half.

The full week 11 Game Scripts below: [continue reading…]

{ 0 comments }

The Least-Conforming Game of 2018 Might Surprise You

There have been two really remarkable upsets this season: one at the time, and one particularly in retrospect.

In week 3, the Bills went on the road and hammered the Minnesota Vikings, 27-6. Buffalo was a 16.5-point underdog; this season, no other team has won a game as an underdog of more than 10 points. It was an anomaly of historic proportions, marking the first time a team was ever a 15-point underdog and won by 15 or more points.

The other remarkable game was in week 1, when the Saints lost at home to Tampa Bay. The Bucs are 2-7 since that game, while New Orleans is 9-0. So while it was a huge upset at the time — it is tied with Titans/Jaguars as the second biggest upset of the season (10-point spread) — it’s even more remarkable in retrospect. [continue reading…]

{ 0 comments }

Week 11 Passing Stats: The Stars Shine

The top 5 passers of week 11 consist of the three best QBs this season — Drew Brees, Patrick Mahomes, and Jared Goff — and the two quarterbacks who, at various times, have been considered the most valuable quarterback assets in the league: Andrew Luck and Aaron Rodgers.

Brees had zero sacks and zero interceptions while averaging over 12 yards per pass attempt and throwing for 4 TDs, making him the best passer of the week. Luck also had no sacks or interceptions, averaged over 10 yards per attempt, and threw 3 TDs. Rodgers averaged 11 yards per attempt and threw a pair of touchdowns, but his 5 sacks knocked him down below Luck. Mahomes had 478 yards and 6 TDs, but also 3 INTs and 3 sacks. Still, he averaged over 10 yards per attempt and threw 6 TD. It’s kind of a quirky stat, but Mahomes had by far the best passer rating in NFL history among players with at least 3 INTs in a game. Jared Goff took 5 sacks, but threw no interceptions and threw for 413 yards and 4 TDs.

The average ANY/A in week 11 was 6.24, making it a below-average week by 2018 standards. Below are the week 11 passing stats: [continue reading…]

{ 0 comments }

Reid looks up at the scoreboard and sees more points

Tonight is one of the games of the year: the 9-1 Chiefs against the 9-1 Rams. This is perhaps the best regular season game, by record, since another primetime game featuring Andy Reid’s Chiefs back in 2013, when the 9-0 Chiefs traveled to Denver to face the 8-1 Broncos.

Back then, I wrote about the best regular season matchups ever. And I’ve also written about the worst regular season matchups ever. And to be clear, there’s no right or wrong way to identify the best or worst matchup ever, even if you just base things on record.

You can’t use just winning percentage, because it’s hard to compare teams who have played a different number of games (is a matchup of two 3-0 teams better than a matchup of two 9-1 teams? I don’t think so, but winning percentage says otherwise). One solution is to add 11 games of .500 football to each team; in other words, add 5.5 wins and 5.5 losses to each team. For the Chiefs and Rams, that would make both teams 14.5-6.5, which translates to an adjusted winning percentage for both Kansas City and Los Angeles of 0.690. A game between two 3-0 teams would have an average adjusted winning percentage of only 0.607, which is one reason why I like this formula.

So where does Rams/Chiefs rank? With all due respect to the classic 49ers/Browns games from 1948, I’m limiting today’s post to games since 1950. And tonight’s matchup is the 20th best game during that period. The table below shows the best matchups in the NFL since 1950. Each game is listed from the perspective of the winner, and displays each team’s each team’s adjusted winning percentage and the average of the two adjusted records. Finally, I’ve included a linkable boxscore to each game. [continue reading…]

{ 0 comments }

Punting on 4th-and-2, Trailing, Late in the Game

Last night, Mike McCarthy decided to punt on 4th-and-2, from the Green Bay 33-yard line, with 4:20 remaining and the Packers trailing the Seahawks 27-24. Aaron Rodgers never again took the field, as Seattle picked up two first downs and ran out the clock.

Since 2008, there have been 17 examples where a team trailed by 1-7 points, in the final 5 minutes of the game, and punted on 4th and short (1, 2, or 3 yards).

Three times, those teams won: JaMarcus Russell and the Raiders pulled it off against the Broncos in 2009, Russell Wilson and the Seahawks famously defeated the Patriots in 2012 in this situation, and Derek Carr and the Raiders pulled it off against the Chiefs in 2017.

In his career, Rodgers has had 99 cases where the Packers had a 3rd-and-2 or 4th-and-2 from at least 30 yards away from the end zone. Green Bay picked up a first down 55% of the time.

What do you think?

{ 0 comments }

Week 10 (2018) Game Scripts

Previously:

No time for commentary from me today, but here are the Week 10 Game Scripts.

TeamH/ROppBoxscorePFPAMarginGame ScriptPassRunP/R RatioOp_POp_ROpp_P/R Ratio
BUF@NYJBoxscore41103120.4274637%371867.3%
NOR@CINBoxscore51143720.3274736.5%271662.8%
PITCARBoxscore52213119.4283048.3%342260.7%
CHIDETBoxscore34221215.3312258.5%482466.7%
TENNWEBoxscore34102412.3273642.9%461970.8%
GNBMIABoxscore3112199.5302554.5%432365.2%
CLEATLBoxscore2816128.5212942%541974%
KANARIBoxscore2614128332358.9%442563.8%
INDJAXBoxscore292637292355.8%383452.8%
LAC@OAKBoxscore206145.8272650.9%412166.1%
WAS@TAMBoxscore163134.4292652.7%432464.2%
DAL@PHIBoxscore272073.7402858.8%461674.2%
LARSEABoxscore363150.5412364.1%303446.9%
NYG@SFOBoxscore27234-1.5322358.2%392957.4%
{ 0 comments }

For purposes of grading each team’s passing attack in each season since 2002, let’s look at where each team ranked in Adjusted Net Yards per Attempt. Next, let’s group teams into 5 buckets of four teams each based on the following ranks:

— Best passing offenses — i.e., the teams that rank 1, 2, 3, and 4 in ANY/A
— Good passing offenses — those teams that rank 8, 9, 10, and 11
— Average passing offenses — teams that rank 15, 16, 17, and 18
— Bad passing offenses — teams that rank 22, 23, 24, and 25
— Worst passing offenses — teams that rank 29, 30, 31, and 32

I went ahead and calculated the ANY/A of those teams for each season since 2002. In the graph below, I’ve plotted the results, taking the average ANY/A of those teams.

The most remarkable part of this: in 2018, the teams that rank 22nd, 23rd, 24th, and 25th in pass efficiency have an average ANY/A of 5.86. In 2002 and 2003, the teams that ranked 8th, 9th, 10th, and 11th in ANY/A had average ANY/A of 5.82 (’02) and 5.84 (’03). Those same teams are at 7.17 this year.

What stands out to you?

{ 0 comments }

In March, the Jets inexplicably signed Josh McCown to a 1-year, $10M contract.

A few days later, the Jets sent three 2nd round picks along with the 6th pick in the 2018 Draft to Indianapolis to move up to the 3rd spot. That made the McCown signing even more odd in retrospect:

The Jets have mucked up the quarterback position for as long as anyone can remember, and you can add giving McCown $10M to Mike Maccagnan’s tab next to “trading up for Bryce Petty,” “using a second round pick on Christian Hackenberg”, and “sending a fortune to get a top-3 quarterback prospect”, and “getting into a stalemate with a journeyman quarterback and then giving him $12M.”

On Sunday, McCown was the worst quarterback in football. Paying $10M to a quarterback coach is not justifiable, and paying $10M to a quarterback mentor — whose mentees include Hackenberg, Petty, Johnny Manziel, and Mike Glennon — only works if he can be a great backup quarterback on a team in need of a great backup quarterback.

The full week 10 passing stats below:

RkQuarterbackTmOppResultAttYdsTDIntSkYdsANY/AVALUE
1Ben RoethlisbergerPITCARW 52-2125328501616.23243
2Mitchell TrubiskyCHIDETW 34-2230355301713.16195
3Drew BreesNORCINW 51-1425265300013153
4Baker MayfieldCLEATLW 28-1620216300013.8139
5Andrew LuckINDJAXW 29-2629285310010.34101
6Blake BortlesJAXINDL 26-293832020009.4799
7Matt BarkleyBUFNYJW 41-1025232201810.1585
8Marcus MariotaTENNWEW 34-1024228202149.7775
9Jared GoffLARSEAW 36-3139318202118.4665
10Philip RiversLACOAKW 20-62622321118.0432
11Carson WentzPHIDALL 20-2744360212107.529
12Patrick MahomesKANARIW 26-1428249205377.6425
13Jeff DriskelCINNORL 14-5134500001524
14Eli ManningNYGSFOW 27-233118830187.520
15Aaron RodgersGNBMIAW 31-1228199202177.416
16Darius JenningsTENNWEW 34-1012100002114
17Ryan FitzpatrickTAMWASL 3-164140602287.1613
18Logan ThomasBUFNYJW 41-101150000158
19Brian HoyerNWETENL 10-3417000070
20Julian EdelmanNWETENL 10-341600006-1
21Logan CookeJAXINDL 26-291400004-3
22Russell WilsonSEALARL 31-3626176304356.7-5
23Teddy BridgewaterNORCINW 51-141000000-7
23Taysom HillNORCINW 51-141000000-7
25Dak PrescottDALPHIW 27-2036270104316.48-16
26Alex SmithWASTAMW 16-32717810386.33-16
27Joshua DobbsPITCARW 52-212-30000-1.5-17
28Matt RyanATLCLEL 16-2852330202196.5-20
29Dontrell HilliardCLEATLW 28-16100100-45-52
30Tom BradyNWETENL 10-3441254003235.25-71
31Derek CarrOAKLACL 6-2037243004404.95-79
32Nick MullensSFONYGL 23-273925012004.62-88
33Cam NewtonCARPITL 21-5229193215464.18-91
34Andy DaltonCINNORL 14-5120153124242.46-106
35Matthew StaffordDETCHIL 22-3442274226453.73-151
36Brock OsweilerMIAGNBL 12-3137213016502.74-177
37Josh RosenARIKANL 14-2639208125422.18-206
38Josh McCownNYJBUFL 10-4134135023190.7-228
Total92571445018695096.87

This was another remarkable week for NFL passers, who completed 630 of 925 passes (68.1%) for 7,144 yards, with 50 TDs and just 18 INTs. That translates to a 100.9 passer rating, and there were 19 quarterbacks who had a passer rating of over 100 and threw 20+ passes. This came despite there being just 28 teams active in week 10! The quarterbacks took 69 sacks for 509 yards, and finished with a 6.87 ANY/A average. It was yet another remarkable passing week in the best passing season of all time.

Finally, let’s look at the full season passing stats: you have Philip Rivers at #4, and in front of him is a rival quarterback from his own division, a rival quarterback from his own city, and his former teammate. And the bottom three are all rookies, in a narrative twist from the “why are rookies all of the sudden good” trend we had seen in recent years:

RkQuarterbackTmAgeAttYdsTDIntSkYdsANY/AValue
1Patrick MahomesKAN23345315031717959.28994
2Jared GoffLAR243323134226191149.09895
3Drew BreesNOR3930426012119719.28859
4Philip RiversLAC37272245921412759.24767
5Matt RyanATL333533015213241638.32672
6Ryan FitzpatrickTAM36225219917913698.68509
7Ben RoethlisbergerPIT36369288821712797.65423
8Aaron RodgersGNB353552741171251867.5366
9Carson WentzPHI262692148153231567.39248
10Mitchell TrubiskyCHI242902304197181147.32242
11Deshaun WatsonHOU232852389177301497.19206
12Russell WilsonSEA302471967215292047.09154
13Tom BradyNWE413712748177161116.88132
14Kirk CousinsMIN303632685175241416.87129
15Cam NewtonCAR292922086175171306.751
16Andrew LuckIND29371247226910766.5920
17Alex SmithWAS34301204510319996.28-81
19Blake BortlesJAX26328234112818896.16-130
20Andy DaltonCIN3131222551810201536.06-158
21Derek CarrOAK273202441108281696.07-163
22Matthew StaffordDET303312385168291816.01-189
23Eli ManningNYG373462565116322396.02-195
24Brock OsweilerMIA28178124764161245.48-205
25Joe FlaccoBAL33379246512616795.96-226
26Marcus MariotaTEN25203149875251495.54-226
27Baker MayfieldCLE232851984137221545.78-232
28Dak PrescottDAL252731930115321845.71-253
29Jameis WinstonTAM24148118161013604.91-261
30C.J. BeathardSFO25169125287181565.03-281
31Case KeenumDEN3033024001110241745.64-318
32Josh AllenBUF2213983225211673-566
33Josh RosenARI21208128068211553.86-612
34Sam DarnoldNYJ2128919341114211294.5-632
Lg Avg00104677879152324574849126.540

What stands out to you?

{ 0 comments }

The 2018 season is the greatest season in passing history. In week 10, prior to Monday Night Football, NFL passers have thrown 855 passes and completed 584 of them for 6,706 yards with 46 TDs and 16 INTs. That translates to an average passer rating of 101.8, which would make this in the running for the greatest single week for passing in history. A whopping 18 of the 26 starting quarterbacks this week had a passer rating of over 100!

But it’s not just the name brand quarterbacks that are doing well. Let’s exclude Carson Wentz and Jameis Winston, who began the season as backups in name only (Wentz was injured; Winston was suspended). And let’s not include Ryan Fitzpatrick, who is obviously having a very strong season for a “backup” quarterback.

And let’s ignore the first round rookie quarterbacks, who aren’t true backups in the way we think of the term. That leaves seven quarterbacks who by any definition qualify as backup quarterbacks: Brock Osweiler, C.J. Beathard, Derek Anderson, Blaine Gabbert, Josh McCown, Matt Barkley, and Nick Mullens. And so far this season, they have thrown more TDs than INTs and have completed over 60% of their passes:

In fact, backup quarterbacks now have a stat line that is roughly equal to league average from the early ’00s: a passer rating of 80.6 and an ANY/A average of 5.20. Four of these quarterbacks — in particular Barkley (on a salary of $790K for 2018), Mullens ($1.05M), Osweiler ($880K), Anderson ($1.1M) — are arguably replacement level (shockingly, the Jets are paying McCown $10M this season). And those four quarterbacks have an ANY/A average of 6.00 and a passer rating of 86.9!

2018 is truly a case of a rising tide lifting all ships.

{ 1 comment }

The Giants, Dolphins, and Simpson’s Paradox

This year, the Giants are averaging 6.35 net yards per pass and 4.18 yards per carry. That’s below-average on both counts, as New York ranks 20th in both categories.

This year, the Dolphins are averaging 6.53 net yards per pass and 4.30 yards per carry. Miami ranks 15th in NY/A and 17th in YPC.

And yet the Giants are averaging more yards per play this year than Miami! How is that possible — after all, plays are just rushes or passes (including sacks), and the Dolphins are averaging more yards per pass and yards per rush. But New York has gained 5.70 yards per play this year, while Miami is averaging only 5.58 yards per play.

The answer, of course, is Simpson’s Paradox. We can also see an example of Simpson’s Paradox with Chicago. This year, the Bears are averaging 6.65 net yards per pass and 4.45 yards per carry. That’s above-average in both categories, as Chicago ranks 12th in both metrics. And yet the Bears rank below the Giants in yards per play, at just 5.65.

This is because the Giants pass a lot, and passes are more effective at gaining yards (even net of sacks) than rushes. The Giants have passed on a league-high 70% of plays, while Miami has passed on 58% of plays and the Bears just 54% of plays.

This happens with a few teams every year. The Jaguars are averaging 6.02 net yards per pass, 4.25 yards per rush, and 5.41 yards per play. The Redskins are averaging 6.12 net yards per pass and 4.33 yards per rush, and yet… Washington is only averaging 5.34 yards per play, a lower average than Jacksonville. That’s because the Jags have passed on 66% of plays, while the Redskins have passed on only 56% of plays. [continue reading…]

{ 0 comments }
Next Posts Previous Posts