Adam Steele is back for another guest post. You can view all of Adam’s posts here. As always, we thank him for contributing.
In the same vein as Bryan Frye’s kneel, spike, and first down data and Tom McDermott’s adjusted SRS ratings, I want to contribute some corrections in data distortion. From a stat geek’s perspective, there’s nothing more annoying than strong teams resting their starters in the final week of the season, as it pollutes season long statistics with a game’s worth of junk data. In a 16 game season, even one meaningless outlier can have a big impact on season totals and averages. The most egregious example is the 2004 Eagles, who stormed out to a dominant 13-1 start only to mail in their final two games by a combined score of 58-17. Philly’s season totals look far better (and far more accurate) once those two meaningless games are removed from the sample. I went back to 1993 and noted every game where one team sat their starters and/or played vanilla football with no intention of trying to win. In some instances, a team was clearly going full bore in the first half, then waved the white flag after halftime. In these games, I pulled out the junk data from the second half only.
There are obviously going to be some judgment calls in deciding whether or not a team was really trying to win a given game. For example, this past season’s week 17 matchup between Seattle and Arizona could be viewed two different ways – Arizona was trying to win (at least in the first half) and Seattle just stomped them, or the Cards weren’t really trying even though their starters played the first half. I chose the latter. The one notable game I purposely left out was the week 17 Packers/Lions shootout from 2011. The game was technically meaningless for both teams, and Green Bay kept Rodgers on the bench, but otherwise all the starters played and were clearly playing to win. If the Packers didn’t care, Matt Flynn would not have thrown six TD passes. If you dispute any of the games I’ve listed, I’m happy to discuss and reconsider!
How to read the table: The first five rows are self-explanatory; “Type” designates whether the whole game should be discarded or just the second half; Points, PaTD, and RuTD indicate the points and offensive touchdowns scored during junk time (the stats I believe should be removed from the season data). Defensive numbers can be found by simply looking at the offensive numbers from the team’s opponent.
Team | - | Opp | Year | Wk | Type | Pts | PaTD | RuTD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEN | @ | IND | 2015 | 17 | Full | 24 | 1 | 2 |
IND | TEN | 2015 | 17 | Full | 30 | 2 | 0 | |
SEA | @ | ARI | 2015 | 17 | Full | 36 | 3 | 1 |
ARI | SEA | 2015 | 17 | Full | 6 | 1 | 0 | |
WAS | @ | DAL | 2015 | 17 | Half | 10 | 1 | 0 |
DAL | WAS | 2015 | 17 | Half | 9 | 1 | 0 | |
BUF | @ | NE | 2014 | 17 | Full | 17 | 1 | 1 |
NE | BUF | 2014 | 17 | Full | 9 | 0 | 0 | |
DEN | @ | OAK | 2013 | 17 | Half | 3 | 0 | 0 |
OAK | DEN | 2013 | 17 | Half | 14 | 2 | 0 | |
BAL | @ | CIN | 2012 | 17 | Full | 17 | 0 | 2 |
CIN | BAL | 2012 | 17 | Full | 23 | 1 | 0 | |
TB | @ | ATL | 2011 | 17 | Full | 24 | 2 | 0 |
ATL | TB | 2011 | 17 | Full | 45 | 2 | 3 | |
OAK | @ | KC | 2010 | 17 | Full | 31 | 1 | 2 |
KC | OAK | 2010 | 17 | Full | 10 | 0 | 1 | |
TB | @ | NO | 2010 | 17 | Half | 13 | 1 | 0 |
NO | TB | 2010 | 17 | Half | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
CIN | @ | NYJ | 2009 | 17 | Full | 0 | 0 | 0 |
NYJ | CIN | 2009 | 17 | Full | 37 | 0 | 4 | |
GB | @ | ARI | 2009 | 17 | Full | 33 | 1 | 2 |
ARI | GB | 2009 | 17 | Full | 7 | 1 | 0 | |
IND | @ | BUF | 2009 | 17 | Full | 7 | 0 | 1 |
BUF | IND | 2009 | 17 | Full | 30 | 3 | 0 | |
NYJ | @ | IND | 2009 | 16 | Half | 26 | 0 | 1 |
IND | NYJ | 2009 | 16 | Half | 6 | 0 | 1 | |
TB | @ | NO | 2009 | 16 | Half | 17 | 0 | 1 |
NO | TB | 2009 | 16 | Half | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
NE | @ | HOU | 2009 | 17 | Half | 14 | 0 | 1 |
HOU | NE | 2009 | 17 | Half | 21 | 1 | 2 | |
NO | @ | CAR | 2009 | 17 | Full | 10 | 0 | 1 |
CAR | NO | 2009 | 17 | Full | 23 | 1 | 1 | |
ARI | @ | NE | 2008 | 16 | Full | 7 | 1 | 0 |
NE | ARI | 2008 | 16 | Full | 47 | 3 | 2 | |
TEN | @ | IND | 2008 | 17 | Full | 0 | 0 | 0 |
IND | TEN | 2008 | 17 | Full | 23 | 1 | 0 | |
TEN | @ | IND | 2007 | 17 | Full | 16 | 0 | 1 |
IND | TEN | 2007 | 17 | Full | 10 | 1 | 0 | |
SEA | @ | ATL | 2007 | 17 | Half | 24 | 2 | 1 |
ATL | SEA | 2007 | 17 | Half | 27 | 3 | 0 | |
IND | @ | SEA | 2005 | 16 | Full | 13 | 1 | 0 |
SEA | IND | 2005 | 16 | Full | 28 | 2 | 2 | |
CIN | @ | KC | 2005 | 17 | Full | 3 | 0 | 0 |
KC | CIN | 2005 | 17 | Full | 37 | 1 | 3 | |
ARI | @ | IND | 2005 | 17 | Full | 13 | 1 | 0 |
IND | ARI | 2005 | 17 | Full | 17 | 2 | 0 | |
SEA | @ | GB | 2005 | 17 | Full | 17 | 1 | 1 |
GB | SEA | 2005 | 17 | Full | 23 | 1 | 1 | |
MIA | @ | NE | 2005 | 17 | Half | 15 | 1 | 0 |
NE | MIA | 2005 | 17 | Half | 16 | 2 | 0 | |
PHI | @ | STL | 2004 | 16 | Full | 7 | 1 | 0 |
STL | PHI | 2004 | 16 | Full | 20 | 1 | 1 | |
ATL | @ | NO | 2004 | 16 | Full | 13 | 0 | 1 |
NO | ATL | 2004 | 16 | Full | 26 | 1 | 1 | |
ATL | @ | SEA | 2004 | 17 | Full | 26 | 2 | 0 |
SEA | ATL | 2004 | 17 | Full | 28 | 2 | 2 | |
IND | @ | DEN | 2004 | 17 | Full | 14 | 2 | 0 |
DEN | IND | 2004 | 17 | Full | 33 | 2 | 1 | |
PIT | @ | BUF | 2004 | 17 | Full | 29 | 1 | 0 |
BUF | PIT | 2004 | 17 | Full | 24 | 0 | 2 | |
NYJ | @ | STL | 2004 | 17 | Full | 29 | 1 | 0 |
STL | NYJ | 2004 | 17 | Full | 32 | 3 | 1 | |
CIN | @ | PHI | 2004 | 17 | Full | 38 | 1 | 3 |
PHI | CIN | 2004 | 17 | Full | 10 | 1 | 0 | |
DEN | @ | GB | 2003 | 17 | Full | 3 | 0 | 0 |
GB | DEN | 2003 | 17 | Full | 31 | 1 | 2 | |
PHI | @ | TB | 2001 | 17 | Full | 17 | 2 | 0 |
TB | PHI | 2001 | 17 | Full | 13 | 0 | 1 | |
TEN | @ | PIT | 1999 | 17 | Half | 16 | 1 | 0 |
PIT | TEN | 1999 | 17 | Half | 29 | 2 | 1 | |
STL | @ | PHI | 1999 | 17 | Half | 14 | 2 | 0 |
PHI | STL | 1999 | 17 | Half | 21 | 1 | 0 | |
SF | @ | SEA | 1997 | 17 | Full | 9 | 0 | 0 |
SEA | SF | 1997 | 17 | Full | 38 | 4 | 1 | |
PIT | @ | TEN | 1997 | 17 | Full | 6 | 0 | 0 |
TEN | PIT | 1997 | 17 | Full | 16 | 0 | 1 | |
DEN | @ | SD | 1996 | 17 | Full | 10 | 0 | 1 |
SD | DEN | 1996 | 17 | Full | 16 | 1 | 0 | |
SF | @ | MIN | 1994 | 17 | Full | 14 | 2 | 0 |
MIN | SF | 1994 | 17 | Full | 21 | 0 | 1 | |
DAL | @ | NYG | 1994 | 17 | Full | 10 | 0 | 1 |
NYG | DAL | 1994 | 17 | Full | 15 | 1 | 0 | |
PIT | @ | SD | 1994 | 17 | Half | 21 | 2 | 1 |
SD | PIT | 1994 | 17 | Half | 20 | 0 | 2 | |
PHI | @ | SF | 1993 | 18 | Full | 37 | 3 | 0 |
SF | PHI | 1993 | 18 | Full | 34 | 2 | 2 |
My plan is to eventually do this all the way back to 1970, then publish the “real” points scored and allowed for each team by prorating the pristine data to a full season.